Skip to content
Chuck GossJacob NemetzJude NwokoTal PerryRated 4.9 out of 5Rated 4.9/5.0 by 30+ customers

Infrastructure StandardsWe Don't Compromise On,Project To Project

Reliable, secure, and automated infrastructure from day one.

Two engineers discussing code on a monitor in a server room
  • 100% infrastructure as code
  • 24/7 system monitoring
  • 30% potential cloud cost savings

Trusted by Forward-Thinking Companies

Thirteen products shipped across healthcare, fintech, marketplaces, and workplace software. Different industries. Different stacks. The same team behind all of them.

Where This Expertise Gets Tested

TWS applies the same infrastructure discipline regardless of scale, but what gets tested changes with it.

  • New Product Build

    Infrastructure decisions made in week one are the ones nobody revisits until they cause a problem.

    1. You don't want to over-provision before you have real traffic.

      Infrastructure gets sized for actual expected load, with a clear scaling path.

    2. You need CI/CD from the start, not once things get chaotic.

      Every project gets a pipeline from the first deploy, so "we'll automate it later" never becomes technical debt.

    3. You don't have a dedicated DevOps hire yet.

      Infrastructure as code means the setup is documented by definition, so it doesn't depend on one person's memory.

    4. Security needs to be built in, not retrofitted before a customer's security review.

      Baseline security practices, like least-privilege access and secrets management, are default.

    5. You want to avoid vendor lock-in you'll regret later.

      Architecture decisions account for portability where it matters, instead of defaulting to whatever's fastest to set up.

  • Scaling Infrastructure

    The setup that worked at low traffic is starting to show exactly where it wasn't designed for more.

    1. Manual scaling is turning into a recurring fire drill.

      Autoscaling gets configured around real traffic patterns.

    2. Deploys have become risky enough that releases happen less often than they should.

      Pipeline hardening, staged rollouts, and automated rollback reduce the risk enough that shipping more often becomes safe again.

    3. Cost has grown faster than usage actually justifies.

      A structured cost review finds the specific idle or oversized resources driving the bill.

    4. Monitoring exists, but nobody's confident it would catch a real incident.

      Observability gets rebuilt around actual failure modes.

    5. Multiple environments have drifted out of sync with each other.

      Infrastructure as code enforces consistency across environments, because the definition is the source of truth.

  • Enterprise-Scale Infrastructure

    At this scale, the failure mode is inconsistency across teams and systems, not a single misconfigured server.

    1. Different teams manage infrastructure differently, with no shared standard.

      A shared IaC standard applies uniformly, so infrastructure is legible to any engineer with access.

    2. Compliance and audit requirements demand infrastructure be provably consistent.

      Everything defined in code is auditable by design, which matters when a regulator or enterprise customer asks for evidence.

    3. Multi-service architecture makes a single incident hard to trace.

      Observability is architected across services.

    4. Migrations at this scale feel too risky to attempt.

      Migrations happen staged and monitored, validated at each step, never as a single high-stakes cutover.

    5. You need infrastructure expertise that scales with organizational complexity, not just server count.

      Architecture decisions account for team structure and ownership boundaries.

Our Point of View on Infrastructure

Five standards that apply to every engagement, regardless of client size.

  • Infrastructure as code

    Every environment is defined in version-controlled files. Manual server configuration isn't an acceptable shortcut, even under deadline pressure.

  • CI/CD as a default, not an add-on

    Every project gets an automated pipeline from the first deployment.

  • FinOps discipline

    Cost gets reviewed as a first-class engineering concern.

  • Observability built for real failure modes

    Monitoring and alerting get designed around what actually breaks.

  • Security by default

    Least-privilege access and secrets management are baseline.

Infrastructure That Held Up at Scale

Infrastructure expertise shows up in what didn't break when real traffic hit.

Dash

dash, an automation platform TWS built with AWS infrastructure scanning and report generation as its core function, is a direct proof point: the same discipline applied to analyzing client infrastructure is the discipline applied to building the platform that does the analyzing.

How This Expertise Changes What You Can Actually Run

Four ways real infrastructure discipline changes what your engineering team can do.

  1. Nobody's Infrastructure Knowledge Is a Single Point of Failure

    Infrastructure as code means the actual configuration is the documentation.

    A new engineer, or an auditor, can read exactly how the system is built without asking around.

  2. Deploys Stop Being a Coin Flip

    The same automated tests and checks run on every deploy, which means a bad change gets caught in the pipeline, not in production at 2 a.m.

    That's the difference between shipping cautiously twice a month and shipping confidently every day.

  3. The Cloud Bill Becomes an Engineering Decision

    Treating cost as a first-class concern, alongside speed and reliability, means spend tracks actual usage instead of accumulating unnoticed.

    That's what turns "the bill is high" into a specific, fixable line item.

  4. An Incident Gets Found in Minutes

    Monitoring built around your system's real failure modes means an incident gets traced to its source quickly, instead of triggering a scramble across five dashboards that don't talk to each other.

    That's the gap between a five-minute outage and a five-hour one.

What Our Clients Say

  • I've been very impressed with how collaborative the Team Work Spirit team has been over the past year. They've always engaged as an embedded part of our team, and never as a separate entity with extra barriers to communication.
    Chuck GossDirector of Development at Kizen
  • Oleksandr is a very knowledgeable developer. He has worked well with our team and is good at communicating and helping us solve problems. We look forward to working with him in the future.
    Jacob NemetzFounder & CEO
  • The TWS team did an excellent job in consulting with us on DevOps strategies as well as driving strategy implementation to completion in a very timely manner. The team is very professional.
    Jude NwokoCTO, Okada Books
  • I found Oleksii to be very knowledgeable and reliable. We always know what we would get with him and when we would get it. Oleksii was available to discuss decisions and present options to us.
    Tal PerryFounder, LightTag
  • Oleksandr and his team helped with our work in a timely manner, provided excellent communication, adherence to deadlines, and went above and beyond the scope of the project.
    Marcus ArkanFounder & CEO
  • Oleksandr has a great work ethic and very good communication skills. He took some very complex ideas and programmed them out for us with excellent quality. He is very responsible and responsive.
    Joel TherienCEO
  • I had the pleasure of working and learning with them. They were dependable and reliable to go above and beyond expectations when needed to get the required work complete.
    Melissa CohoeProject Manager
  • Oleksii really knows everything that is required to get the job done. Several times during the contract he was given short notice about problems that we were experiencing and with super speed in each case he responded.
    Andrew BlakeFounder & CEO

How We Work

Four steps, applied the same way regardless of engagement size.

  1. Audit the current state

    We look at what's actually running, how it's configured, and where it diverges from IaC discipline.

  2. Design against the standard

    Target architecture gets designed to the same principles: as-code, observable, cost-aware, secure by default.

  3. Implement and validate

    Changes roll out staged and tested, never as an untested cutover.

  4. Document and hand off

    The infrastructure is legible to your team when we're done, not dependent on us to keep running.

Our Tech Stack That Drives Results

  • React
  • Vue
  • TypeScript

Get the Free Infrastructure Audit

Give us read-only access. In 48 hours you get a report on security gaps and exactly where you're overpaying right now.

Get my free audit

Frequently Asked Questions